Vol. 10.1 June 2006


ANNOUNCEMENT


The Possibility of Intercultural Law

On 9 and 10 June 2006, the Annual Meeting of the Association for Legal Philosophy will be held in Conference Center Kaap Doorn, Driebergen/Zeist, The Netherlands. This year the annual meeting is combined with a two-day international conference entitled: ‘The Possibility of Intercultural Law’.

Introduction to the conference
In the past decades debates have developed around multiculturalism and legal pluralism. The rise of international terrorism and growing tensions between different cultural orientations within the nation state have given these debates a sharp edge. On the one hand politicians, scholars and other public opinion makers call for a rehabilitation of presumed indigenous norms and values, demanding of residents with roots in other traditions to take over the national canon or otherwise – as some suggest – leave. On the other hand, proponents of multiculturalism and legal pluralism call for the acceptance of difference, declaring that bridging such difference is in fact impossible because we are all caught up in our own parochial perspectives. Though it may be easy to argue that both positions are unwise and in fact start from the same (mis)conception of ‘culture’ as homogenous and ‘cultures’ as mutually exclusive, it may be more difficult to advance a third position in which difference is respected yet not glorified, and in which a positive theory of intercultural law can be developed. In the context of this conference ‘intercultural law’ should be understood as a type of law that manages to bring together a diversity of legally relevant social practices. This would mean that such law regulates diversity without enforcing rigid unity and without endorsing a normative chaos that would lead to legal uncertainty. For legal philosophy the question is whether this is indeed possible: Which are the epistemological and methodological presumptions of such a conception of law? Do we have to discard the central tenet of some post-modern comparativists that proclaim the incommensurability of cultures? Do we have to relativise Western conceptions of positive law? To what degree is coordination of diversity sustainable? At which point will legislation or adjudication have to cut the knot, for instance in order to reduce complexity? This conference aims to raise these questions and others that may appear relevant.

Information
For information regarding the format of the conference, participants, programme and registration please visit the conference webpage: http://rechten.uvt.nl/vwr/.




EJCL home Archives Search Comments Help EJCL home